Showing posts with label demostrations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label demostrations. Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Attempt to prevent MACC officials from being called to testify in Teoh's death inquest


File picture of Teoh’s family. They received a perplexing text message last Friday.


Gobind (right), Teoh’s parents and today’s witness Woo Chuan Sing (in black), Teoh Meng Kee (blue) and Tan Boon Wah (white) arriving at the Shah Alam court.




The Attorney General (AG) appears to be closing doors today in an attempt to bring a quick end to the high-profile inquest of a DAP political aide, Teoh Beng Hock, which started three months ago.

A private lawyer hired to act on behalf of the AG raised more than eyebrows today when he tried to limit the witnesses which lawyers representing Teoh’s family and the state government want to bring in.

Former deputy public prosecutor, Tan Hock Chuan who is assisting the coroner’s court, had argued that there was no need to call senior graft busters, Hishamuddin Hashim and Hairul Ilham Hamzah, into the witness box, despite testimonies from the MACC rank-and-file that they had got their instructions from the two.

Gobind Singh Deo and Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, lawyers for the Teoh family and Selangor respectively, were outraged at what they claimed was a gross injustice preventing them from finding out what had really happened to Teoh.

Malik stressed that both Hishamuddin and Hairul Ilham were the most senior MACC officers involved throughout the investigation and would be the best men to shed light on several puzzles, especially as their junior officers had clearly said they got orders from the duo.

The argument went back and forth, with voices getting progressively louder.

The magistrate finally said he would decide on the matter when the inquest resumes tomorrow morning.

Mystery DNA man in Teoh belt.

Tan had earlier told the court that the mystery of the unknown male DNA found on Teoh’s coat and belt had been solved.

Government DNA expert, Dr Seah Lay Hong, will be recalled to the witness box to reveal the identity of the mystery man.

Teoh family asked to go for ‘mental test’

In another twist to the ongoing drama surrounding Teoh Beng Hock's mysterious death, the young political aide's family and friends recently received a perplexing text message asking them to go for a psychiatric evaluation at a government-run hospital in Selayang this morning.

Speaking on behalf of the family, Teoh's younger sister, Lee Lan, 28, told The Malaysian Insider that her father, Leong Hwee, and would-be sister-in-law, Soh Cher Wei, both received a similar text message last Friday afternoon.

The family members and friends decided against going to the hospital after being advised by lawyer Gobind Singh Deo, who is acting for the Teoh family.

But he stressed that it is rightfully the magistrate who is acting as coroner in the inquest who must decide on the need at this late stage in the inquest.

“The prosecution must be very careful,” he warned.

He pointed out that two pathologists had already given evidence in the coroner's court and concluded that Teoh had committed suicide even though they admitted they did not question Teoh's family to find out the deceased's state of mind.

“Is the prosecution saying they will recall witnesses and change their stand?” Gobind challenged.

Teoh family and employer claim foul play and not suicide.

“He’s a very loving and helpful person,” Teoh’s elder brother, Meng Kee, 33, told the coroner’s court today when he stepped into the witness box.And when lawyer Gobind asked him point-blank if he knew of any reason that would push his baby brother to suicide, Meng Kee said: “No, sir!”.Two pathologists who carried out the autopsy on Teoh had previously said that the signs point to suicide.

MACC lawyer, Datuk Abdul Razak Musa, who crossed-examined Meng Kee after Gobind, hinted that Teoh,who was pressed to hold a shotgun wedding because his girlfriend was two months pregnant then, may have faced money woes.

He suggested that traditional Chinese weddings were costly affairs running into the tens of thousands, and Teoh could have hardly afforded it on his political secretary pay of only RM1,800 a month.

But Meng Kee disagreed. He said his brother had savings and that Chinese weddings could cost under RM20,000. He added that the siblings would also help Teoh out financially.

Teoh’s friend, Woo Chuan Sing, who had been invited to be the best man at the wedding planned for Oct 3 that will now never be, told the court that he was unaware that his best friend had faced any recent problems.

He had last spoken to Teoh over the phone on the morning of July 15.

Lawyer Malik has been struggling for the past month to bring in a Thai forensic pathologist to support their theory of possible homicide in Teoh’s inquest. He finally succeeded today.

Magistrate Azmil fixed Oct 20 and 21 to hear Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand’s testimony.

--------------------------------------

More than 2,000 people gathered for the funeral of Teoh Beng Hock in Alor Gajah, Malacca. During the funeral rites, which began at 9.45am, Teoh's pregnant fiancee Soh Sher Wei read out a moving tribute.

----------------------

------------------------------

Lim Guan Eng spoke about MACC, Police and the controversial death of Teoh Beng Hock, who was a special assistant to Selangor executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah.

Teoh's body was found on Thursday sprawled on the roof of an adjacent building after he had undergone questioning late into the night at the offices of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

----------------------------

More than 3,000 people have packed the Kelana Jaya stadium in a two-hour gathering to mark the death of political aide Teoh Beng Hock. Pakatan Rakyat top brass, including Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim and Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, took turns to address the crowd.

------------------------








Friday, September 4, 2009

Kg Buah Pala: It’s a done deal ... just about


Down it comes: A couple of workers from the developer’s office demolishing one of the houses in Kampung Buah Pala.


Final decision: Lawyer Darshan Singh Khaira (third from left) and former ISA detainee P. Uthayakumar (third from right) speaking to Kampung Buah Pala residents outside the courtroom in Putrajaya Friday. The people have vacate their kg. The land sell is legal.



Rising tension: Ho (right) being surrounded by Kg Buah Pala supporters and residents over the demolition of a house in the village. Nusmetro director Gary Ho at the far right corner.



The 11 remaining temporary occupation licence (TOL) holders of Kampung Buah Pala now want to accept the developer’s double-storey house offer.

They have asked to be given the ex-gratia offer -- which was taken up by the other holders -- again during a meeting on Wednesday night, said developer Nusmetro Ventures (P) Sdn Bhd executive director Thomas Chan.

The meeting was attended by Chan, the village committee members and representatives of landowner Koperasi Pegawai Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang.In an immediate response, residents association chairman M. Sugumaran, one of the 11 TOL holders yet to sign on the ex-gratia deal, said they had always wanted to accept the offer -- provided terms and conditions were fully spelled out in black and white.


“We will probably arrange a meeting for them with the state government tomorrow (Saturday). A lot will depend from the outcome of the negotiation before we can build additional houses,” he said. Initial 24 house now 33 house. Additional house will require approval from government.

He added they could seek assistance from deputy Chief Minister II Dr P. Ramasamy, who is in charge of the matter.

He said they would submit a new development plan by next week.

“Once it is approved, we anticipate the 33 houses to be ready in two years time,” he said.

Chan also said the state government had set a bad precedent over the Kampung Buah Pala land issue by raising the expectation of squatters in Penang.

“It is no longer a RM75,000 low-medium cost house that they want as settlement. They want double-storey houses now.

“This move has create issues in several areas like Tanjung Tokong and Mak Mandin where squatters are expecting more from the developers or land owners,” he said.

Chan said the demolition of houses at the village will continue on Saturday. He hoped there would not be any more repeat of Thursday’s high drama, when police detained 18 people, of whom only five were from the village. They were later released on police bail.


----------------


---------------

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Four Kampung Buah Pala Houses Demolished In Third Attempt


Residents and their supporters stand off with riot police as they tried to prevent a demolition team from pulling down their homes





Plans foiled: Villagers being prevented from entering the state administration office at Komtar yesterday.


-Police personnel trying to restrain angry Kg Buah Pala residents on Thursday.

Police detained 18 people, including three women and the villagers' lawyer Dharshan Singh.

The tractors finally moved in and four houses came down.

It was D(emolition)-Day again at Kampung Buah Pala on Thursday with the villagers realising it would be futile to stop their houses from being torn down.

They, however, managed to take out their frustrations at developer Nusmetro Ventures Sdn Bhd director Gary Ho over how many houses would be demolished.

Policemen had to escort workers from house to house to carry out the demolition as earlier the villagers blocked tractors from entering the village.

Below is an account of what transpired:(Source the star)

2.02pm: Workers and light strike force team start to leave village. Only three houses and one room of the fourth house were demolished.

1.50pm: Gary Ho says that only four houses will be demolished today while the rest would be demolished in the coming week.

1.20pm: Workers move on to house No 481, which has been vacated. The owner allows them in without incident.

All three houses were vacated by the owners earlier.

Demolition work starts on the fourth house 473 where the residents have not vacated.

Only a room located outside the house has been torn down.

1.16pm: Workers move out of house No 486, stopping to break down the gate with sledge hammers on their way out. Third house to be demolished now.

1.03pm: The rain peters out to a slight drizzle.

12.58pm: They arrive at House No 486 and workers begin demolishing the house.

12.55pm: Police and the light strike force advance up the road, escorting demolition workers. They meet little resistance because of the rain.

12.50pm: Heavy rain begins, curious onlookers disperse. Those who remain are mainly police and media.

12.45pm: Police stay put on road to village while residents retreat into the village.

12.40pm: At least 14 people were detained including lawyer Darshan Singh and three women.

Light strike force team escorting court officials was obstructed by the people.

12.30pm: The villagers, supporters and MIC youth members are lining up at the entrance of the village obstructing the light strike force team.

One person has been detained by police for obstruction.

12.20pm: Villagers release goats and gather to block the entrance chanting anti-DAP slogans as they blame the state government for their demolition.

12.10pm: Crowd gets restless as police try to restore order. They start chanting “developer balik” as their representatives, developer and bailiff hold discussions in police mobile station on more demolitions.

Villagers’ lawyer Dharshan Singh arrives telling the crowd that the developer has no right to demolish the houses and the crowd gets more worked up.

11.20am: While demolition of house number 467 continues, other villages who fear their homes would be demolished next, appeal to Thomas Chan who is standing outside a mobile police station to save their homes.

10.36am: House 467 is believed to be demolished as sounds of house being broken can be heard by press members who are barred from entering the village.

10.31am: Police lead five contractors with sledgehammers into the village to house number 467 to demolish it.

10.20am: Police discuss with Sugumaran and resident association assistant secretary C. Tharmaraj and urged villagers to keep to their word given to the developer.

The police also asked MIC youth chief T. Mohan to stop party youth members from creating further fracas such as stopping the tractors.

10.15am: Gary Ho is rescued by the police.

10.10am: Tractors start to move in after several villagers agree for the developer to help in the demolition works.

However, due to ignorance about an agreement made to demolish the houses, some other villagers and supporters tried to stop the tractors.

Some also wanted to attack Gary Ho. The police light strike force steps in to maintain order.

10.07am: Villagers outside house number 467 come to an agreement with the police on the demolition.

Still unclear who will break the houses as the police ask reporters to leave the area.

9.55am: Nusmetro director Gary Ho arrives with house keys. He appeals to the residents not to delay the demolition process.

Residents and developer are still debating on who should conduct the demolition of the two houses.

9.30: Sugumaran said the villagers want to demolish the two houses themselves.

They marched to the houses. Villagers and supporters blocked the press entering the village and a scuffle breaks out.

9.20am: Kampung Buah Pala Residents Association chairman M. Sugumaran met Nusmetro Venture executive director Thomas Chan and later informed the press that two families had agreed for their homes to be demolished as they had accepted compensation and handed over their house keys to the developer.

8.30am: Two mobile police stations and three police vans arrive at Kampung Buah Pala.

Demolition of houses stated to take place today.

7.30 am: MIC youths and residents line-up to block entrance.

More than 20 contractors with hammers and crowbars ready to move into the village.

---------------------


The highly controversial eviction of Kampung Buah Pala villagers started today as developer Nusmetro Venture (P) Sdn Bhd moved in to tear down houses of owners who had agreed to relocate.

The demolition job started with a house whose owner had accepted compensation in the form of an alternate house and a relocation cost. The owner voluntarily handed over his house keys to the developer.

Under the watchful eye of the police and the residents association committee, the demolition team moved in to tear down this house. Some hours later, a second house was also torn down.



---------------------------




-------------------------------

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Kg Buah Pala residents seek police protection as deadline passes


An aerial view of Kampung Buah Pala.



Just another day of everyday chores in Kampung Buah Pala.


Where motorbikes and cows roam for now, maybe not for long - Kampung Buah Pala.



Draviam Arul Pillai, he wants to know where gets to live now if evicted.The oldest resident in Kg Pala.85 years old cattle herder who owns a little grocery shop. Father was bought in by Brown Family in 1920s.


Family in Kg Pala . Will this be their last Merdeka Celebration in Kg Buah Pala?


Village people: Family members and supporters waiting for the trio to be released at the Jelutong police station Sunday.



The Kampung Buah Pala residents and media members waiting outside the the
administration lobby of Komtar on level 3 with police personnels as the former
were not allowed to enter into yesterday.




Several Kampung Buah Pala residents sitting at the public lobby of Komtar while
holding up banners as part of their hunger protest yesterday.


Twenty-three families in Kampung Buah Pala who are supposed to vacate their houses handed a memorandum to the police on Tuesday, seeking assurance of their safety in the village.

The two-page memorandum was handed over by Kampung Buah Pala Residents Association chairman M. Sugumaran to the Head of Management of the Penang police headquarters, ACP Zakeri Kamaruddin, at 10.30am.

Sugumaran said the residents had sought police assurance of their safety as they were firm on staying in the village until a consensus was reached between the residents and the developer.

"Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng's attitude towards this issue has left us in a lurch.

"We want to move but refuse to do so due to the loose offer and unkept promises by the developer. Until the problem is solved, we won't budge," he told reporters after handing over the memorandum, here.

Meanwhile, Penang acting police chief Datuk Tun Hisan Tun Hamzah refuted the allegations that the police favoured the developer and the state government in the issue.

The majority of the villagers, about 300 ethnic Indians, have resisted all attempts by the developer to get them out. They have even threatened to go on a hunger strike on Tuesday.

All is quiet at the village with a few residents keeping vigil at the entrance, local online reports said.

The Kampung Buah Pala villagers will have to vacate their land by Wednesday following the Federal Court's decision on August 20 which rejected the appeal of the 23 families to stay on the prime land.

The developer had failed in its two attempts to demolish the village due to protests by the affected families.

Nusmetro Ventures (P) Sdn Bhd executive director Thomas Chan had said the company would take vacant possession of the land any time after September 1.

The developer had offered the residents a double storey house in return of their vacating the premises. However, most of them have rejected the offer.

Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng says the state government had nothing to do with the recent arrest of three Kampung Buah Pala residents committee members.

Lim said he did not control the police, and thus had no knowledge of why they were detained.

“Since the residents have sought the help of Umno, they should ask Umno for an explanation.

The state government has no idea about any action taken by the police (against them),” he said after visiting a Merdeka baby at KPJ Penang Specialist Hospital in Bandar Perda here Monday.

On Saturday, police detained the committee’s chairman M. Sugumaran, secretary J. Steven and assistant secretary C. Thamaraj at about 10pm on grounds of criminal intimidation.

They were arrested over an Aug 4 police report lodged against them by several contractors who claimed that the three men had threatened them.

Lim said it was clear that there was an attempt by certain quarters to undermine the state government.

“But, I am certain they will not succeed because the people of Penang are solidly behind the Penang state government.

The villagers had been locked in a protracted battle to save their homes from being demolished after the land was sold to Koperasi Pegawai Kerajaan Pulau Pinang (KPKPP) by the previous state government.

After the villagers lost a court battle against the sale of the land, Nusmetro, under pressure from the Pakatan Rakyat state government to reach an amicable settlement, offered link houses to the residents.

But many of the villagers rejected the offer, and claimed the agreement presented to them by Lim was full of loopholes and placed them at a disadvantage.

Chief among the restrictions was that the residents were required to drop all legal action filed against the landowner, KPKPP, and relevant parties, and to refrain from filing any new suits.

The agreement would also be automatically cancelled if the project was not approved by the authorities, putting residents at risk of being left high and dry.

Lim however has dismissed the concerns, saying the clauses are part of a “standard agreement.”


What Penang People feel now?
Public sentiment has clearly turned against the residents of Kampung Buah Pala and they know it.

Any sympathy for the community, which trace their roots back to the colonial Brown Estate over 150 years back, was lost after news spread that they had rejected an offer for double stories houses from developer, Nusmetro Ventures (P) Sdn Bhd.

However residents claim they were being given a raw deal and have been unfairly maligned in the press.


Why reject the link house deal by the developers?

Draviam Arul Pillai, the oldest surviving villager whose father was first brought to Kampung Buah Pala in the 1920s by the Brown family ,acknowledged himself they had no documents giving them rights over the land.

But he said he refused to take the offer because no mention was made about when and where the new houses would be built or what would happen to the villagers in the meantime.

“There was nothing in black and white, all we had were promises.” He said, insisting that he would have taken the deal if it was more concrete.

He argued that today’s DAP government could be gone tomorrow and there was nothing in the document to ensured the houses would be built.

Besides a brief description on size of the houses, there was little else in the offer letter.

There was also a requirement for the villagers to drop all their legal claims while the houses would be built subject to approvals from the local government, failing which the villagers would have no legal recourse.

The concerns of the villagers were relayed to the state government after the offer by Sungai Siput MP Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj.

When contacted Dr Jeyakumar said the concerns of the villagers were legitimate and not unreasonable.

“They wanted safeguards because the company could go bust and then they would be left with nothing.”

Who resposible for this problem face by Kg Pala people?

Originally Brown family in 1920s bought in the Kg Pala people here to management the estate.Later the land was given to the government of that time and the people are issued Temporary Occupation License. However , under the BN government Tun Koh Tsu Koon sold off the land and let the developer deal with the settlements.

Draviam blames both the present and past state governments for the dilemma but is more bitter with the DAP, who he said had made the plight of the village an election issue.

“We had always supported BN until they sold our land so we voted for the opposition because they promised to help us, but they have forgotten this,” he said.

He also lashed out at the MIC as well as other political parties and Non Government Organisations (NGO) which he said were trying to get political mileage but have done nothing to solve their problem.



--------------------



------------------





Hindraf, previous Barisan Nasional state government and the current Penang state government under Pakatan Rakyat are involved in the Catch 22 situation faced by Kampung Buah Pala villagers. Hindraf is reported to organize a demonstration nationwide, burning of Lim Guan Engs effigy at Komtar, Penang and defend the villagers of Kampung Buah Pala. Meanwhile, the Pakatan Rakyat state government under CM Lim Guan Eng are looking for an amicable solution for the villagers. Barisan Nasional is blamed for the sticky mess .


-----------------------





The mainstream media reported that MIC President, Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu is working with CM Lim Guan Eng to resolve the Kampung Buah Pala issue. Datuk Samy Vellu is said to have spoken to CM Lim. However, CM Lim revealed in a press conference in his office on 27 July 2009 refuting the claim and even remarked that, "It is all a big bluff by MIC. " Further, CM Lim said the biggest bluff of all is the Maika Holdings shares where shareholders have been cheated of their savings and have not got a single cent in return.

-----------------------

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Cow-head protest was end of tether for Sect 23 folk


Graffiti near the proposed site of the temple makes it clear how residents here feel.


Some residents, like Mainora, fear the issue could turn into a powder keg.


Having the temple so close to their playground will stop children from playing there, parents claim


The predominantly Malay-Muslim residents feel a sense of betrayal by their elected representatives


Sect 23 resident Sukhani has resorted to flying Umno flags to show his anger.



For the residents of the middle class Taman Ixora neighbourhood in Section 23 here, the cow-head protest after Friday prayers underlined their anger and frustration against a government unwilling to heed their views.

While they have mixed feelings about brandishing a cow-head during the protest, they are adamant in not wanting the Section 19 Sri Mahamariamman Temple relocated to their predominantly Malay-Muslim neighbourhood, more so near the Surau Al-Jannah.

“I attended yesterday’s demonstration because this is my neighbourhood and I must show support. That is what I want. I hung this Umno flag, but I voted one for Khalid Samad and Rodziah. I voted for PKR but I felt cheated. I have this Umno flag to show my anger,” Sukhani Mohd Jamil stressed, venting his anger at the state lawmakers.

Khalid Samad is the Shah Alam MP, which encompasses this neighbourhood in the predominantly Malay constituency.

The Section 23 action committee against the temple construction had sent a protest memorandum to Rodziah explaining that the temple was just 160 metres from the houses, 50 metres from a playground and 150 metres from Surau Al-Jannah. They demanded a public hearing but the Batu Tiga state assemblyman said it was unnecessary as the area was industrial land.

There was also fear in some of the residents as they are afraid that this issue might explode into a racial backlash.

“Of course, nobody wants the temple. It is too near to the playground. This has become an issue. I am scared that this will lead to fighting. They are too sensitive on this issue. Can you ask Rodziah why she wants to build it there?” Mainora Muir Hassan explained.

The mother of four stressed that the temple was not in the plans when they bought the house and questioned if the state government can do this.

“If there is not any temple, then we won’t buy. The price of our houses will also fall. Khalid wants tolerance but how can there be tolerance when it is near to the surau?” she added.

Pakatan Rakyat politicians claimed that most of the protesters were not from Section 23 and the demonstration was orchestrated by Umno.

However, local residents refuted this claim and said it was unfair because they are fighting for their neighbourhood and not for any political party.

“It is not a question of Umno or not, we are all Muslims. I am disappointed that a Muslim leader has neglected the Muslim community. Our religion has been sidetracked,” Latiff Roslan said.

“It is not a question of Umno or not, we are all Muslims. I am disappointed that a Muslim leader has neglected the Muslim community. Our religion has been sidetracked,” Latiff Roslan said.

The businessman was confused why the state government had decided to build the temple near their homes when there was no objection to build the temple in Section 22 as originally planned.

“Playground is for our children, children won’t go there to play and parents won’t allow them to play. Why is this temple made into an issue? People have objected to this temple so the government should stop the project.

“I read in the papers, that they want to move the temple by 300 metres. There is no land for the temple to be relocated by 300 metres. They want to put in the temple in the factory? So they are trying to lie to us and we cannot accept it,” he said.


The residents feel that they are being neglected by their leaders and are fed-up with Khalid’s call for religious tolerance.

“Khalid Samad is a liar, he likes to tell lies. He is scared to face the people. If the temple can be relocated by 300 metres, why not five kilometres? They asked us to tolerant. We can be tolerant but they must find a suitable location,” Azman Abdul Majid said.

The Telekom Malaysia employee added that politicians are abandoning religion for votes.

There were mixed emotions on the severed cow-head being used in the demonstration but they agree that the protestors just wanted to show their anger.

The residents are planning to seek a court injunction if the state government continues its plans to build the temple there.


--------------------


Related Posts with Thumbnails

Latest Malaysia News